Sri Lanka will not
face severer risk at the event of an accident at the Koodankulam Nuclear
Power Plant built in the Tirunelveli district of the southern
Indian state of Tamil Nadu, Minister of
Technology, Research and Atomic Energy Patali Champika Ranawaka said. In
response to the recent developments at Koodankulam Nuclear Power Plant (KKNPP),
He added that people living within a radius of
150km were at greater risk and Koodankulam was 200km away from the country.
Koodankulam Nuclear Power Plant in Tamil Nadu |
Since the Indian government did not share
information regarding safety planning at Koodankulam, Sri Lanka had to ask for
IAEA assistance. The IAEA had intervened and supplied early warning systems to
the country. Ranawaka said that seven of them have been installed in potential risk
areas. He said that some anti-Sri Lankan elements wanted to portray Sri Lanka
as a ‘pariah state’ by spreading rumors over various nuclear deals. Speaking
further, he stated that Sri Lanka was only interested civil nuclear
applications and not in power generation
Tamil Nadu has been suffering from unprecedented power cuts, despite
which there have been protests against the Kudankulam nuclear power plant. The
Russian-built Kudankulam plant is the country's largest nuclear power project
and is designed to help meet a surging demand for electricity. Plans were first
drawn up in 1988 and it was supposed to have gone into operation in 2011. Koodankulam Nuclear Power Plant has two reactors. When fully
operational it will generate 2,000 MW of power. In the first phase, it will
generate 1,000 MW of power, and in the second phase, an additional 1,000 MW
will be generated.
Two of the reactors are now in place but they have come on line amid
large-scale protests by locals about the threat of radiation. Several petitions
had been filed before the top court by anti-nuclear activists challenging the
project on safety grounds.
Here are the pros and cons of the power plant:
Pros:
1. It can supply electricity to at least 200 million homes
2. Capable of generating 1000 MW of power when operational
3. Has in-built safety measures that minimise the risk of any radiation
leak
4. The location of the plant is in an area that is least prone to
earthquakes, and its height ensures potential safety from tsunamis
5. Storage and disposal of nuclear waste major cause of concern
Cons:
1. Sub-standard equipment, faulty parts have been installed at the facility
2. Fishermen allege that the 14,000 crore project is fundamentally unsafe
and they fear it will destroy fish in the sea, affecting their livelihood
3. Ecological damage by radioactivity is feared
4. Quick evacuation for those living around the plant, in case of disaster
will be very difficult
5. Radioactivity from the plant, and unsafe disposal of nuclear waste, may
cause cancer and other health problems